There is a movement in the FERC . . .

www.contentsunderpressurebook.com

NOPR for NAESB 3.0 Issued July 16, 2015

On Thursday of last week, the FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) proposing the adoption and implementation of Version 3.0 standards of the Whole Gas Quadrant (WGQ) of the North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB).  Whew!  That’s a mouthful!

Hooray!

This was a new and unusual position for NAESB in that the FERC never took action to adopt NAESB’s WGQ Version 2.1 standards.  By adopting the Version 3.0 standards, the adoption will incorporate all changes made for Versions 2.1 and 3.0.

The FERC is proposing these standards be implemented for business on April 1, 2016.  This makes a lot of sense and complements the timeline for the FERC’s recent Order 809 deadline of additional intraday cycles for April 1, 2016 (see other blog posts for other components of the Order 809 document). Additionally, this deadline gives everyone a big window of time to make the changes, test thoroughly and move into production for April 1.

So what does Version 3.0 contain?

1 – Moving the nomination deadline from 11:30 a.m. to a later 1 p.m. time.

2 –Addition of another Intraday cycle into the nomination timeline.

3 – Removal of the requirement to use, display and maintain common location codes through the Data Reference Number (DRN) location identifier.

4 – Reporting requirements for Design Capacity and definitions to distinguish Design Capacity from Operating Capacity.

5 – Requirement to post Offers to Purchase Released Capacity

6 – And, of course, the usual maintenance modifications, additions of new elements, additions of new codes.

The good news is that none of these are major game changes to the way we do business today.  The other news, however, is that the impact on IT systems can often be deeper than anticipated.

Moving the nomination deadline from 11:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. sounds like a huge win because now shippers and marketers will have the ability to trade gas for an extra 1 ½ hours each day! The other side of that coin, however, is that now pipelines have to shorten their confirmation and scheduling window from 5 hours to 4 hours.   Four hours may sound like plenty of time to schedule a pipeline but scheduling is not the only time consumer.  The confirmations process may require several iterations between pipelines when the gas flows through multiple interconnects between the wellhead and the burnertip. And for pipelines with a complex scheduling scenario, such as multiple constraints and reticulated, the scheduling process requires multiple iterations; some before the confirmation process and some after.  Pipelines that have solved this problem and whittled it down to a short a precise timeline will be able to move to a four hour window easily.  Other pipelines that still struggle to meet the five hour window will have to have process changes and system changes to squeeze the process into four hours.

And this is one example.  My point is that any of the seemingly clear and simple requirements of NAESB V3.0 and FERC Order 809 may be ones that cause difficult system changes for a pipeline or for a marketer.

4 thoughts on “There is a movement in the FERC . . .

  1. 3 – Removal of the requirement to use, display and maintain common location codes through the Data Reference Number (DRN) location identifier.

    Did they have any more information on this? What does this mean to all the current meter #’s out there?

    Like

    1. Great Question! The proprietary code for locations has been deleted and now, in the go-forward versions, the data field labeled “location” will house the proprietary code. That being said, if a company wanted to continue to use the Data Reference Number as their proprietary code, there would be nothing to prevent them from doing this. The data maintenance committees determined that the cost of maintaining the Data Reference Numbers was not worth the value the provided. We were (and are) still in a mode where you have to maintain the other party’s code for a location on the other side of an interconnect. That issue existed with the DRN and hasn’t gone away now that we are using the proprietary code. In summary – you can continue to use a DRN and maintain it to use as your proprietary code or if you have an existing proprietary code, you can convert over to using it. The transfer to the new codes will be on April 1, 2016.

      Like

  2. An impressive share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a little analysis on this. And he, in truth, purchased me breakfast as a result of I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love reading extra on this topic. If possible, would you mind updating your weblog with extra particulars? It is highly helpful for me. Huge thumb up for this blog post!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s